Being
Heard: Thinking Through Radio With Palestine (October 2023–)
Soundcamp
cooperative
Abstract
We
describe Radio With
Palestine (RWP), a project that broadcasts live sounds from
demonstrations. Reflecting on RWP as ongoing work, we are thinking about
rhythms, temporalities and resonant spaces of direct actions as manifestations
of political urgencies and injustices. Ecological
radio moves live sounds from place to place, colliding timeframes and
moments of emergent struggles, creating a live
archive that aims to amplify and document ephemeral situations, without
turning them into spectacles or specimens.
During
RWP, people attend actions in support of Palestine and run live audio
streams. Using free streaming apps and DIY audio devices with omni-directional
microphones, RWP enacts a form of flat
listening against the grain of mainstream media. Events vary from minor
acts of resistance at neighbourhood scale to large, conventionally
under-reported protests.
By
drawing attention to how (different) these situations sound, we can think about
the ways direct actions work beyond each site, with its distinct architectures,
tempos and acoustics. Being in and broadcasting streets full of dissonant
sounds and voices, hearing ourselves back with lag, we sense both the possibilities and the limits of synchrony
and solidarity.
Keywords: Radio, Palestine, Sound, Ecologies, Activism, Live
Introduction
The task … [is] to let the
infrastructure become part of the new action, even a collaborative actor.
(Judith
Butler 2015, 127)
This
paper reflects on Radio With Palestine (RWP), an ongoing project that
repurposes mobile technologies and urban architectures to broadcast live sounds
from actions and demonstrations. Thinking through RWP opens questions
about activism, the urgencies and limits of synchrony, solidarities, and the
live. We address these questions with reference to key terms from Soundcamp’s work over a decade: ecological activist radio,
flat listening, the live archive and lag [1].
Our
approach comes out of a transmission arts and activist practice. This paper
offers an experiential account of broadcasting from the streets, among sounds,
where the direction of an action is uncertain, and a variety of voices and
rhythms can be heard interacting with the surroundings and each other. We draw
on critical writing to understand and convey these experiences, without
pretending to offer a systematic theoretical account. As such we hope to
contribute to a conversation that is ongoing and incomplete [2].
Broadcasts/Actions
From
2021, Soundcamp had a monthly show )Listening
room( on
the Bethlehem-based station Radio al Hara, broadcasting environmental sounds
from the Acoustic Commons network [3]. This show came to a halt in October
2023, after twenty-six editions, when the station suspended its regular
programming, coinciding with a wave of protests against
the Israeli invasion. Radio With
Palestine started as an improvised set of responses to this situation.
During
RWP, people attend actions and run live audio streams, using free
streaming apps and DIY audio devices (see Technical). Interventions vary from
minor acts of resistance at neighbourhood scale to large, conventionally
under-reported protests. The following notes and reflections are chosen to
suggest the range of scales and forms of broadcasts and actions. The listening
notes in the margin and gutter give a more detailed sense of them through their
sounds.
28
October 2023
Victoria
Embankment to Whitehall, London
Live
streams by the Soundcamp cooperative
Streambox
field transmitter, Locuscast for iPhone
A
large national march set off from Embankment, following the river west, and
crossed over Westminster bridge, turning east along the south bank to Waterloo
Bridge, where it crossed back. The mobile networks were overloaded coming out
of Embankment underground station, in a hollow. The broadcast started late as
streamers rigged antennas with bamboo and a fishing pole. Others went further
along the route, where the signal was more stable. The march stretched across
two bridges and both embankments, forming a long loop. A variety of chants
reflected different perspectives and responses among sections of the march,
with voices converging forcefully from time to time on simple demands:
Stop
Bombing Gaza.
Ceasefire
Now.
4
December 2023
Camberwell
Green to Windrush Square, Brixton, South London
Live
stream by the Soundcamp cooperative
Locuscast
for iPhone
We
came across the march by accident as it passed through Loughborough Junction, and joined the end. Conversation with a veteran
protester, part of a duo with Hoot Your Support signs. When we arrive at
Windrush Square, we are thinking of previous actions, including the BLM protest
in June 2020 (self-noise.net 2020). Police detained a boy and held him in a
van. The action changed. People surrounded the van, some sitting in front and
behind, while others argued with police officers around it. The police presence
became more forceful, with more police arriving, pushing people in the road.
The small crowd seemed mainly undecided and unsure, with few experienced
activists. Individual voices and sounds of physical presence, the microphones
among bodies, with close-up antagonism between the police and demonstrators and
bystanders. Somebody spotted when the police brought a second van and moved the
boy to it along an open corridor created by pushing people back and staging a
diversion. Some of the crowd returned to the Palestine protest, where a PA had
been set up under a large tree. Speakers condemned the police actions, pointing
to analogies between the situation in Gaza and asymmetries of power in Brixton.
For periods, this felt like a situation on the verge of becoming something
else, forced by the police actions to interrogate its own motivations,
potentials, and limits. The broadcast failed to record.
11
January 2024
Outside
the International Court of Justice, The Hague
Live
stream by Ivo Blackwood (Soundcamp cooperative)
Izicast
for iPhone
[See
the IRC log]
A
formal, theatrical setting, in which a spokesperson and key actors addressed
the crowd, first in person, then via a screen and sound system streaming audio
from the hearing to a public area outside. The accusation of genocide was read
out. The lawyers bringing and responding to the case were introduced. They made
short prepared speeches. Mainstream media were
covering the event from a designated area. Listening between RWP and
official coverage revealed differences between using a directional microphone to
focus on the official speakers, and using
omni-directional microphones which convey the entire soundworld.
Similarly, coverage from inside the courtroom, where admittance was restricted,
contrasted with a gregarious open-air scene, with a back and forth between
testimony and evidence on the screen and sounds from the crowd. This was
possibly more evident on the broadcast than in person, since the radio dampened
the impact of the screen, creating a more level, ambiguous set of exchanges.
9
February 2024
Area
C, Upper Jordan Valley
Live
stream by Meira Asher (radioart106)
Izicast
for Android
To
prevent disruption by the authorities, the protest was largely unannounced. The
stream began as soon as Meira left the bus on which activists were arriving. It
conveyed sounds of the situation and the site, together with interviews where
participants were invited to describe their involvement and to address a
potential live audience abroad, perhaps in London. Military police arrived,
made arrests, and confiscated equipment (instruments, banners). After
negotiation, the detainees were released and their belongings returned, on
condition that the action ended. Participants dispersed.
17
February 2024
Speakers
Corner, Hyde Park to [near] the Israeli embassy, South Kensington, London
Stream
by the Soundcamp cooperative
Streambox
field transmitter
Joined
late by the Albert Memorial, where a workshop with families was making paper
birds and chalk drawings on the road. Walking back along the route toward the
front of the approaching march, near the former embassy of Iran, chanting mixed
with calls for donations and sounds of coins in buckets. Skirting the south
side of Kensington Gardens, the march encountered a series of loudspeakers,
masking unamplified sounds. We reduced the gain. The march ended in a blockage,
with amplified addresses from a large stage further ahead. Unable to continue to the embassy itself, the
march halted and eventually dispersed through side streets.
17
February 2024
George
Square to OVO Hydro, Glasgow
Live
stream by Sasha Baraitser Smith (Soundcamp
cooperative)
Streambox
field transmitter
I
arrived around 1 pm, ate something before starting my stream. People gathered
in George Square slowly. It started to rain. Later the march set off. It was
organised. We crossed Buchanan Street and walked down towards the river.
Passing a McDonalds near Central Station, some people started chanting: Boycott
McDonalds. This quickly faded out. The march slowed and stopped at an
intersection facing the river. Things got a bit quiet. I hoped we would cross.
There had been no marches on the Southside of Glasgow so far. We turned right,
walking down under a series of bridges, parallel to the river. The echoes
energised people. It had been raining on and off all day. I was reminded of a
series of actions that took place during COP26 in Glasgow along this same road.
Up ahead was the Ovo Hydro and the Scottish Events Campus (where COP26 was
held). There were suddenly police visible and we were
stopped from occupying both lanes of the road. People filtered onto the grass
and concrete in front of these buildings.
Some took shelter underneath. No one really knew what to do in the face
of this infrastructure. I peeled off, walking in crowds towards the train
station, where the ticket barriers are open, as if after a large concert.
15
May 2024
From
SOAS student encampment, Central London
Live
stream by the Soundcamp cooperative
Streambox
field transmitter
Nakba
76. When the action took place, the SOAS Liberated Zone had been running for a
week, growing from a half dozen tents to a sizeable camp on a raised grass
quadrangle under a large plane tree. An OSB ramp had been constructed to give
access to the campsite, surrounded on three sides by university buildings. On
the fourth side, speakers (student activists, organisers, trade union
representatives) addressed the crowd, which then moved off on a march through
the surrounding streets—stopping traffic along Tottenham Court Road, sitting
down at the junction with Oxford Circus—before partially dispersing at Soho
Square, with some protesters returning to the camp. Passages of dense energy
down narrow streets with thickly leaved planes, a sounding bloc moving through
the city, heard from within, ahead or behind, carrying unpredictably. Those who
stayed behind at the camp could hear the march returning, before it turned the
corner into sight.
Background
Radio With Palestine
came out of what we were already calling ecological
activist radio (EAR). Soundcamp uses the term ecological with reference to The Three Ecologies of Félix Guattari (1989/2014), who describes ecologies of
environments, organisations, and subjects as inseparable. By holding these
ecological modes together, we are interested to explore and extend the legacy
and practice of the free/libre radio
movements—with which Félix Guattari was associated (Guattari and Rolnik 2007)—in collaboration with less-heard
human and non-human communities.
Ecological
radio was a shorthand for some approaches developed by Hannah Kemp-Welch and
Grant Smith as part of Meet Me on the
Radio, a community radio project with elders in Lewisham, South London
during lockdown (Soundcamp 2024) [4]. It took on a
more considered form with As if radio (AIR), a two-week transmission
during COP26 (the UN Climate Change Conference) in Glasgow (Soundcamp
2021, As if radio).
As
if radio was an attempt to broadcast alternative
sounds of COP26 by giving airtime to the demonstrations, conversations, and
performances taking place throughout the city [5]. Over the two weeks of the COP we ran a 24-hour, collaborative radio station out of
Civic House, Glasgow. Content included live environmental streams; live feeds
from streets, actions, and preparations around the city; transmission works;
and artist conversations responding to an open call. These networked materials
were interspersed with discussions with visitors to the open studio at Civic
House (Soundcamp 2021).
Technical
AIR
developed a signal chain based on affordable omni-directional microphones,
which we make ourselves and in workshops with others, sharing parts lists and
guides. Streamers send live sounds from their locations using DIY field
transmitters (streamboxes) based on open source hard-
and softwares, or with the mobile apps Locuscast or Izicast [6].
Omni-directional
microphones tend to convey different elements of places or situations (human
voices, other sounds) equally,
without hierarchy or a directional subject. Streamers make choices about where
to place a streambox or where in a march to be
(closer equals louder), but the microphones themselves are not selective. A
listener to the stream in situ can hear how this decentres their attention from
focal points to which they are habitually drawn (see Flat listening below).
The
streams are available live with a few seconds’ delay on a server and public soundmap operated by Locus Sonus at the École supérieure
d’art in Aix-Marseille [7]. For each broadcast, members of the Soundcamp cooperative create a mix of streams, which is
sent to a server at Wave Farm in Acra, New York [8]. Sometimes the show is
relayed by other stations [9]. The mix also appears on a page with a player,
where listeners can converse by Internet Relay Chat [10].
The
sounds are live. They are always propagating somewhere, heard with varying
amounts of delay. The live is not the immediate; nor is it the “real-time” of
mainstream reportage, which mainly covers protests by broadcasting pre-recorded
audio/video segments, which have been uploaded to a file repository for editing
and assembly, and are often re-presented as live.
There
are also drops. “Real-time” workflows are designed to avoid dropouts and
disruptions arising from variable networks, broken signal chains, and errors.
At the same time, they tend to select for content that is eventful, impactful,
newsworthy, and consistent with pre-established narratives and perspectives. By
contrast, the materials we are working with contain breaks and inconsistencies.
If these serve as a paradoxical gauge of liveness, they also inadvertently
disrupt the flow of transmission, introducing aporias, creating openings onto
listeners’ surroundings, revealing an imperfect overlay of topologies and
timeframes.
Ecological Radio
Nick
and I consider Guddling, and our practice more broadly, to be an ecological
practice. That is, we see it as a practice through which human-environmental
interrelations are mobilised, experienced and attended to…
(Minty
Donald 2019)
We
think about ecological radio through two key terms:
Transmission ecologies describes the wires, networks, sensors, and social settings
of expanded radio (Friz 2014). We are interested in the sounds that are coming
in, as much as the sounds that are going out, towards non-radial patterns of
radio. This implies a commitment to anti-hierarchical organisation, aiming to
share creative control among a transmission community (see below), and a sense
that promising subjectivities and solidarities can emerge within those spaces.
This leads, in turn, to work with sounds of particular
environments and points of listening in which streamers are interested
and involved.
Ecological
radio involves a kind of flat listening. This term derives from Tristan
Garcia’s (2014, 30) account of the “n’importe quoi,”
the “no matter what”—a moment in perception where identification of the
perceived object is uncertain (is that a bird, a frog, a phone?)—and the value
ascribed to some object over another is suspended for a time. By remaining
unresolved, and acknowledging the ways sounds mix and merge, flat listening is
interested to leave openings onto areas of relative parity among human and
non-human communities. Listening live to everyday sounds in this way tends to
work against the dramatic grain of mainstream media, tuning instead to
alternative histories of the mundane, slow, hidden, inconsequential,
less-heard, weak (Lavery 2016).
Activist Radio
Direct
action is the insistence, when faced with structures of unjust authority, on
acting as if one is already free.
(David
Graeber 2009, 203)
We
think of activist radio as an ongoing experiment. Key points of reference for
us are the “expanded radio” practice described by Kate Donovan at Radio
Otherwise and Archipel Stations; broadcasts between
rivers by Spree~Channelsea Radio Group; work with
interference in the FM spectrum at The Radius; and anecdotes of a moving
Citizen Broadband (CB) radio network between vehicles on the way to protests at
Standing Rock [11].
When
we think about activism in our practice, we have in mind an ability, or an
aspiration, to respond to changes in the environment that come to our attention
or that concern us. This is a partial responsiveness. For each channel that we
pick up, there is a literally unlimited number of other channels that are
ignored. In some cases, the ecological and the activist come together in
obvious ways, as with AIR or War-Torn Ecologies [12]. In others,
the link is more limited, referring to the way the work is positioned as part of the action, rather than a
broadcast of it. This inseparability
(of the transmission from the event) can be thought of in terms of the
infrastructure becoming part of the action, as Judith Butler evokes above, and
as Lazaros Karaliotas describes in the case of the
occupation of Greece’s Public Broadcasting Service (ERT):
In
the days and months that followed, ERT’s buildings, computers, cameras,
microphones, monitors, cables and transmitters were transformed into
infrastructures of dissensus: physical and virtual, embodied and non-human,
infrastructures that enabled the staging and circulation of democratic
disagreement against the twin logics of austerity and post-democratic closure
that scripted the ‘Greek crisis’ and dictated ERT’s closure.
(Lazaros
Karaliotas 2023, 2)
We
learned about this complicity between actions, infrastructures and live
transmission as performance (performance as
if) from thinking through Radio With Palestine, as we discuss in the next section.
Radio
With Palestine (October
2023–)
When
action is formed, noise is produced, and immediately there is something to be
listened to. The word is not something to hold onto. It is for hearing.
(Georgia
Sagri 2021, 125)
Let’s
listen back to this piece of writing from May 2024:
Thinking
about the ongoing UCL encampment and the consequent locking down of the UCL
block [13] brings to the fore, on one hand, the way forms of privacy /
privation and in- / exclusion are already part of our day-to-day urban
architectures [around which you can walk in vain trying to sneak in (where all
the campus guides have been re-assigned to keeping the gates—the minor internal
borders which, seemingly soft, condition our expectations of the possible..)];
on the other: how those architectural forms can be repurposed for reverb,
amplification, re-distribution of sounds between spaces, under the canopy, and
spill out onto the road. On 6 May (2024) students and activists [who had been]
separated from the public, came to the front gate and made noise along the
fence, bouncing across the street and creating concentrated sonic activity,
with the fox hat guy shuttling between SOAS and UCL camps on a bicycle,
recharging megaphones and showing people how to use them [14]. Here we are
thinking with Glissant and Despret about permeable
boundaries, at the same time as we are hearing frictive
tweeting along the boundary—display, noise, amplification, hootback
[15].
Let’s
also listen now to the recording of this
transmission, from the spring of 2024.
How
can holding these hearings together help us think through what RWP has
been and is trying to do? What can this tell us about the faces listening and
writing present to each other, as they articulate the question of pre/post?
The
UCL encampment described as ‘ongoing’ came to an end on 12 August 2024. We were
not available to broadcast that event and are only sure of the date by checking
social media logs now. The spatial disruptions which impressed us then have
returned to normal, leaving few if any traces of the occupation. The surprising
energy of that day (6 May 2024), as conveyed in the experience of the broadcast
can be felt, transposed to text: a sense of heightened expectation; a sense of
running around trying to get in, to be part, converted into convoluted
punctuation (multiple square and rounded brackets); its attempts to negotiate
tenses experienced as the vanishing ground of actions, or presence. Where does
that leave us? Perhaps with the fox hat guy (this enigmatic figure)? And what
to make of partly cryptic references to theoretical writing by academic heavy
hitters on boundaries, bird calls, and performance?
This
all feels quite distant. Past.
Performing Protest
We
can hear at the gates of UCL that, just as no one live performance is identical
to another, actions and demonstrations are also unique and ephemeral. They have
many moving parts: protestors, urban infrastructures, police, passing
cars/buses, spectators, weather, etc., and these interact in unpredictable
ways.
Large
“national” protests involving many people in more prominent spaces (e.g.
capital cities) are more widely reported, and they tend to have a set route,
often announced quite far in advance. They recreate a centralised model in
which people move en masse towards an official (often empty)
target: Parliament, Home Office, official residences. They are spectacular, and
we hear this in the ways thousands of voices can disturb even the most robust
urban environments. We also hear the trajectory of these large-scale actions,
from gathering, through a moment of solidity when numbers are at their
greatest, and towards a final dispersing.
Giving
attention to the unpredictable elements suggested above could shift our focus
away from the scale and spectacle of these actions, and see them as made up of
parts, each part operating as a kind of micro-performance within a wider
improvised score. We hear this when there are multiple streams coming from
different places in a larger action: the Queer Bloc has its own timbres, music
and chants, as does the group “Jews for Palestine,” and so on and so forth. We
hear different languages (¡Viva viva Palestina!),
different kinds of conversations, occasionally we hear moments of synchrony
between and across the march: Stop Bombing Gaza! (see listening
notes).
RWP
is interested in paying attention to the trans-scalar effects of direct action
within large protests, as well as minor acts of resistance and conventionally
under-reported actions at smaller scales. Here the tactics are different. Away
from spectacle, they prefer to occupy more localised sites, opening
up the possibility of integrating direct action into the everyday. Here
routes are often improvised and the trajectory of the
action becomes unclear, as with the march from Camberwell Green to Windrush square
which turned into a stand-off with the police at a very local scale. Here we
get hootback.
Radio With Palestine,
as a form of ecological activist radio, uses transmission [16] and listening
[17] as strategies that could support a re-orientation away from spectacular
displays, and towards practicing resistance, resilience, and occupation of our
public spaces.
Live/Archive
During
actions, public spaces sound different: streets are full of voices, instruments
and cries, with patches of quiet, rather than traffic. If those events create
distinctive soundworlds and energies, it is partly
because they are exceptional and ephemeral.
This
liveliness can feel significant, working with and against the possibility that
an action will be dispersed, run out of steam, conclude, while raising familiar
questions of how activists can resist fatigue. For instance, the upper Jordan
Valley demonstration (see Broadcasts/Actions) was not advertised, to avoid
being shut down in advance. The stream ran for just twenty minutes, at which
point the protest ended. What value is to be accorded to that twenty-minute
period, in anticipation and in recollection, as an opening of sorts?
Can
thinking through live transmission help articulate a pre/post moment which
direct actions seek by necessity to inhabit? Working within historical settings
that feel unpromising or impossible, they find ways to keep possibilities open.
We always plan to occupy as if to stay forever (“we will never rest” is a
recurring chant), while also knowing the summer holidays will come around, when
we will leave to reconnect with our families. Over a longer time frame, we will
come back.
RWP
responds to this situation: working in the live, it commits to being open to
the present and towards arriving futures, while also being drawn to log,
document, accumulate acts of listening and passing time.
Streams
for RWP appear among others as part of a live archive of sounds in
transit, available as a collection of streams on a server list. The archive can
be conventionally opened, without knowing at any given time what will be in
there (Soundcamp 2016). Streams are not usually
recorded, but they can be. Paradoxically, recording can create the possibility
to hold something open, to expose it to second listening, revealing things you
missed the first time (Ultra-red 2016, 187-188).
A
tension between hopes of the live action to remain indeterminate or ajar, and
the archive as a more scholarly, resolved set of practices, or a more
cut-and-dried account, is sometimes quite evident, as in a clip where an
interviewer is heard prompting a group of demonstrators for a statement [18].
We hear the reluctance of the protagonists to lend their voices in this way,
sensing that, in the place of a pre-configured set of ideas, ideologies or
affiliations, they are interested in something less fixed, some version of
“formless formations” that might be emerging (Ruiz and Vourloumis
2021).
If
a pre/post moment that suspends definitions and conclusions can feel
auspicious, it also reflects awareness that the situations the work responds to
are themselves ongoing; the level of difficulty does not lessen over time. On
the contrary, as we know from Land to Return [19], the severity of the
situation can intensify when the media focus has moved on, so the question of
how to give extended attention elsewhere
is an ongoing problematic (Soundcamp 2022). This
links to a reluctance to commit to memory, to paper, to save, to declare a
project done.
Inspired
by ideas and practices of interference, grassroots and community archiving
(Burgum 2022), we are interested in technical and collaborative approaches that
can allow minor acts of resistance
to be logged without sapping and spectacularising their energies,
or bottling their capacities for surprise.
Lag
If
“live” suggests a smooth, impactful mediatisation, the RWP signal chain
is plagued, in fact, by lag: the time it takes for sound to move from the streamer, to a server, to a mixer, to another
server, on to a listener and potentially back to the streamer who is monitoring
the feed. The length of each of these links varies with the route taken through
the networks. There is also a buffer time defined in the Icecast
streaming software which is designed to smooth over these discrepancies [20].
When the buffer runs down or out, this is heard as a variety of minor glitches
or drops. So the liveness of the broadcast is
experienced differently depending on where and how you listen. Lag is prominent
when streaming and listening back “at the same time.”
Being
in and broadcasting streets full of dissonant sounds and voices, monitoring the
broadcast on leaky headphones or on a splitter with somebody else, hearing
yourselves back with lag, you sense both the possibilities and the limits of
synchrony. Lag is what reminds you
that things are out of kilter: it brings out micro-acousmatic, spectral and
uneasy effects, the un-natural quality of the lagged voice, micro-economies of
fluxes, (lost) packets, bounce-back off facades [21].
These
fissures in the “real-time” associated with live actions and streaming media
point to “weak” qualities of actions and affordances (Lavery 2016): suspension,
incompletion, the unevenly present participle, resonance, distortion, decay in
the space of the -ing (Sackett 1995).
Thinking,
as above with performance, about trans-scalar effects and experiences, these
micro-effects correspond with larger questions of historical remembrance. For
many participants, the protests and encampments broadcast by RWP were
occasions to learn about ongoing historical situations of which they were
partially or fully unaware. The downtime of protest camping becomes, in this
way, a study period. Voices heard on RWP reflect at once an urgency for
present and future actions, and a burden of ongoing dispossession (of culture,
homes, or territory), that making noise seems partly to point to and to
re-impress in collective memory.
On
the day of remembrance of Nakba 76, on 15 May 2024, we are inhabiting this
paradoxical space of (temporary/lasting) encampment, which then becomes a
march, before partially dispersing and returning to the occupation, as a minor
figure of resistance, rehearsal or repetition. Staying with the micro-texures of DIY radio, what can be learned from lag as a
figure for collective listening and actions?
Communities of Transmission/Study
As
of May 2024, nineteen of us had been involved in streaming for Radio With
Palestine, with others or the same people mixing or relaying the
broadcasts. We think of this as a community
of transmission (Anna Friz and Jeff Kolar 2014), a group who come together
to make radio. Radio here expands (Donovan 2018) to a wider distributed
practice, including research, development and exchanges of skills, adapting
other devices and networks in order to move live
sounds from place to place and from situation to situation.
This
experiment in collaborative transmission and listening can also be taken as a
form of collective study, with streets and protests as study places. At
pickets, Workers for a Free Palestine (WFFP) organised teach-ins where we
learned, for example, about histories of Jewish labour organisation in the
first half of the 20th century. But we are also pointing to situated ways of
learning independent of content: DIY radio experiments, tinkering, ad hoc
discussions in person and by Internet Relay Chat, from particular
places in a larger event as it is happening, being out of the classroom,
the lecture hall, the theatre, being off the call. As a durational, “eventless”
form, ecological radio is interested in what there is to learn in between
moments of intensity—in the extended periods when nothing much seems to be
going on. The idea of the transmission community reflects a shift of emphasis
from widening our audience to widening and sustaining our community of
practice.
Being Heard
[T]he
flow and force of particular tonalities and musics, silences and noises may transgress certain
partitions or borders, expanding the agentive possibilities of the uncounted
and the underheard.
(Brandon
LaBelle 2018, 2-3)
All
this brings us to thinking about how moving sounds between situations can help
articulate, support, sustain, flow over into live tactics of media, art and
action.
The
broadcasts described above reveal the city as a reservoir of sonic
architectures that can be activated and repurposed. Here we are moving from
terms in sound studies which are static (soundscape, sound field, site, etc.),
and wanting to talk about moving sounds from place to place, situations,
interferences, overlays, energetic exchanges.
By
drawing attention to how different situations sound, RWP insistently
reproduces this multiplicity. Such concerns also support Brandon LaBelle’s
account of sonic agencies, as forces that can be mobilised towards
redistribution of the sensible (LaBelle 2022 and Rancière
2013).
Coda
[All]
public assembly is haunted by the police and the prison. And every public
square is defined in part by the population that could not possibly arrive
there; either detained at the border, or they have no freedom of movement and
assembly, or they are detained or imprisoned. In other words, the freedom to
gather as a people is always haunted by the imprisonment of those who exercised
that freedom and were taken to prison.
(Judith
Butler 2016, 77)
RWP
attempts to practice and communicate solidarities through the borderless radio
space, mixing sounds across multiple locations. It is a signal (and a signal)
to others that there are solidarities and empathetic bodies, beyond and within
the official statements. By translating these actions, demonstrations, and
protests through durational broadcasts, RWP exposes the aspirations and
the limits of these solidarities.
What
Judith Butler describes helps to disturb any sense of adequate “coverage” or
conclusion. Instead, there are urgencies. There are also lulls, periods of
exhaustion, inactions, and distractions. During the time of writing, there have
been shifts and additions to RWP broadcasts and actions. There are
(were) now encampments. So the time of writing is not
homogeneous. This publication does not have temporal flatness.
In
engaging with the ideas of performance, liveness, and lag, we try to think
through patterns of resistance, across temporalities of remembering, and
between marches and encampments. How to hold them open to one another? How can
they be sustaining and not undercut, remaining in the urgencies of the live?
We
invite other streamers, mixers, and stations to join us in an ongoing attempt
to give attention as far as we can [22].
Colophon
Full
list of broadcasts, locations, and credits with links to audio files in
development at:
https://acousticommons.net/listen/rwp/.
We
are grateful for detailed thoughts and suggestions from an anonymous reviewer,
and editing by Anna-Louise Walton, which have helped clarify the paper.
Thank
you.
End Notes
[1]
Soundcamp is an arts cooperative based in London. We
are interested in DIY infrastructures that can move live sounds between places
and situations, and give attention to less-heard human
and non-human communities. Our work appears as live transmissions, workshops,
sound devices and events.
soundtent.org
@sound_camp
[2]
On incompletion, see Harney and Moten (2021). On keeping things open, bringing
theoretical materials without explaining everything exhaustively, acknowledging
the ongoing nature of the work and how it is changing, see Donald (2019).
[3]
The Acoustic Commons network (acousticommons.net) came out of a Creative Europe
collaboration project (2020-2022) between Full of Noises (Barrow, Cumbria), Locus Sonus
(Aix-Marseille), CONA
(Ljubljana), Soundcamp
(London), HMU
(Crete) and Cyberforest
(Tokyo). The network has used live audio streaming to develop environmental art
projects and connect locations.
[4]
Ecological radio developed from Soundcamp’s work on Reveil (2014–) and environmental
streams. An antecedent was “wilderness radio” as proposed in the 1970s by Bruce
Davis (Soundcamp 2016).
[5]
From 18:00 on 31 October 2021, a Samhain performance by the Delegation of Inverbellow moved through the streets of Glasgow, with a
live band and antics engaging members of the public and turning places in the
city centre into surprising sites where it was unclear what was happening or
might happen. The live stream conveyed a sense of instability and a
hard-to-parse mixture of mimicry, skipping, shrieks, sorries
and humanimal sounds. Recording available at
acousticommons.net.
[6]
“Streamboxes” are Raspberry Pi-based transmitters
using software by Stéphane Cousot at Locus Sonus
(locusonus.org/locustream/#phone)
and others, based on the open source streaming software Darkice
by Ákos Maróy, Rafael Diniz, and others
(darkice.org). They receive sounds around them and send them to an Icecast server operated by Locus Sonus at the at the Ecole
supérieure d’Art in Aix-Marseille. Locuscast is a free audio streaming app for iOS and Android
by Stéphane Cousot. Izicast
is a streaming app for iOS by Daniel Noethen (izicast.de). More information on
streaming is available at soundtent.org/stream.
[7]
Live soundmap at locusonus.org/soundmap.
[8]
Locus Sonus hosts the streams as part of the live soundscape project Locustream
(2006–). For RWP, streams are opened in a browser and played one after
another, or occasionally together, using an analogue or digital mixer. We use
Broadcast Using This Tool (danielnoethen.de) to send the main output to the
transmission arts centre, Wave Farm, in Acra, New York (wavefarm.org).
[9]
Stations that have hosted RWP include: Wave Farm WGXC-90.7 FM (Acra,
NY), Radio Al Hara (Bethlehem, PS), Archipel
Community Radio (Berlin, DE), Radio Patapoe
(Amsterdam, NL), Radio Granizo 99.9 MHz (Olmue, Limache CL), Fuse Radio (Bradford, UK), Fade Radio (Athens,
GR), Chercan Radio (Quilpué
CL), CAMP Radio (Pyrenees, FR).
[10]
Listen page with IRC chat at acousticommons.net/listen/rwp/.
[11]
Kate Donovan: mattersoftransmission.net.
Radio
Otherwise: radiootherwise.net.
Archipel
Stations: archipel.community.
Spree~Channelsea
Radio Group: acousticommons.net/~.
The
Radius, Chicago: https://theradius.us/.
We
heard about a mobile radio station among a convoy of protest vehicles from a
veteran anonymous broadcaster, who visited the AIR open studio at Civic House
during COP26.
[12]
Soundcamp broadcast the London iteration of War-Torn Ecologies: Resistant Worlds,
The Mosaic Rooms on 29 June 2024 (mosaicrooms.org/event/war-torn-ecologies-2/).
[13]
On 13 March 2024, UCL Action for Palestine declared the Jeremy Bentham Room at
University College London an Apartheid Free Zone. Wider student occupation
began on the 14 March 2024 at UCL, with an encampment in the main quadrangle.
The perimeter was closed off by the university, preventing people from coming
and going. The broadcast was from 6 May 2024. The camp ended after one hundred
days on 12 August 2024 (@uclactionforpalestine).
On
6 May 2024, students of the School of Oriental and
African Studies (SOAS), University of London, set up a protest camp on a green
next to the main university buildings. The tent camp was evicted on 7 August
2024 (@soasliberatedzone). A few days before, on 5 August, it had divided and
moved to new locations in Bloomsbury and outside the US Embassy in South
London. The SOAS camp continues as a social media presence and through various
direct actions and activities, including outdoor flag-sewing workshops on the
green outside Birkbeck (Tomochan, personal
communication).
[14]
The fox hat guy is an enigmatic figure, whom we have not managed to track down.
Maybe they and somebody else are the same person. Anonymity is part of activist
tactics. Masks are part of the theatre of protest. There is speculation. We are
not sure.
[15]
On permeable boundaries see Édouard Glissant’s Poetics of Relation (1990) and the film Edouard Glissant:
One World in Relation by Manthia Diawara (2010).
On
birds who are drawn to display along the edges of territories see Vinciane
Despret’s Living As A Bird,
translated by Helen Morrison (2021), and "Phonocene:
Bird-singing in a multispecies world," presentation for the Riga
International Biennial of Contemporary Art (RIBOCA) 2 September 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U90M8rhQI6c.
Accessed 23 May 2024. Hootback is when drivers use
their car horns to express approval of an action as they pass.
[16]
Transmission (from: to send, throw
across) refers specifically to acts of sending signals using radio waves. For RWP,
this means using a phone or transmitter which receives surrounding sounds,
digitizes them, and sends them via mobile networks to a server, where they can
be listened to. From the server, they can be relayed by somebody mixing, using
analogue or digital equipment, to select streams and pass them on to another
server. They can also be played out in a space or on headphones. Once a stream is
on a server at a particular URL, whether it is a raw feed or a mix, it can be
picked up by another station. Streamers can also listen back to their own feed
using headphones (to avoid feedback). Together these linkages form more or less simple signal chains, which impact on the
ability of sounds to travel beyond earshot. Transmission for us happens live,
with the latency and lossiness we describe. By
analogy, these practices are linked to other temporalities of transmission: of
ideas, recipes, ways of working, and of contact and contagion (see Soundcamp 2024, Spree~Channelsea
Radio Group).
[17]
Listening implies a degree of
intention. In practice, you can find yourself listening involuntarily to
something, which could be a kind of overhearing. Human ears do not rotate,
prick up or droop as we listen, but our listening is responsive: some sounds
attract and engage it; others we do not become aware of, even though hearing
continues. Living under a flightpath or near a tidal sea demonstrates the way
listening comes and goes. Listening also refers to practices, cultures and
habits associated with particular technologies and
situations, from in-ear devices to public auditoria. Our own thinking on this
subject is shaped by our work with live audio steaming, and by remote listening
to live sounds of environments, both by ourselves and together, and by
recurring practices and habits of writing and discussion, by which sounds
become legible for ourselves, for and with others.
[18]
Maybe this is related to what Fred Moten is saying when he says we don’t need
more statements—we need to discuss among ourselves, as part of renewing our
anti-colonial practice (Moten 2023).
[19]
Land to Return, Land to Care (landtoreturn.com.ua/en/land-to-return-land-to-care.html)
was an “artistic research lab on war experiences” with NGO Slushni
Rechi and Past / Future / Art.
From Autumn 2022, it used live streaming to convey less-heard sounds and
histories of occupation. After this project, as official media attention
shifted elsewhere, these streamboxes have continued
to be moved from place to place and reanimated and repurposed for other
projects, from spontaneous pop-up transmissions to major installations. These
include “As for now, it is quiet” (2024) at Home of Sound, Lviv (https://42at.org.ua/en/about-the-project/)
and “Sounds like home” (2024) with Alisa Oleva (https://compassliveart.org.uk/sounds-like-home-creating-sonic-connections/).
[20] https://icecast.org/.
[21]
The way bat echolocation can sometimes be heard coming back off buildings. The
speed of the sound waves which bats produce for echolocation is relatively low
(although the pitch is high). When they are pitched down with a bat detector
(heterodyning), those sounds can be heard to echo off an adjacent surface, in
addition to the sound that reaches you directly. Some listeners in urban areas
report hearing this echo as extended decay or a separate pulse.
[22]
“It’s not… it’s not… it’s not sufficient to pay attention only to what is
happening in Gaza, but it is absolutely imperative to pay as close… or
possible… as close attention as we possibly can, to what is happening in Gaza”
(Moten 2023).
References
Burgum,
Samuel. 2011. “This City Is An Archive: Squatting
History and Urban Authority.” Journal of
Urban History, 48(3):504-522. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0096144220955165.
Butler,
Judith. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative
Theory of Assembly. Harvard University Press.
Butler,
Judith, Zeynep Gambetti, and Leticia Sabsay. 2016. Rethinking Vulnerability and Resistance.
Duke University Press.
Donald,
Minty. 2019. “Guddling About: An Ecological Performance Practice with Water and
Other Nonhuman Collaborators.” GeoHumanities 5(2):591-619. https://guddlingabout.com/portfolio/guddling-about-essay/.
Donovan,
Kate. 2018. “Expanding Radio: Ecological Thinking and Trans-Scalar Encounters
in Contemporary Radio Art Practice.” Diss., University of Potsdam. https://archive.org/details/DONOVANExpandingRadio/page/n1/mode/2up.
Friz,
Anna. 2014. “Someplaces: Radio Art, Transmission
Ecology and Chicago’s Radius.” Sounding
out! https://soundstudiesblog.com/2014/11/06/someplaces-radio-art-transmission-ecology-and-chicagos-radius/.
García,
Tristan. 2011/14. Form and Object – A
Treatise on Things. Translated by Mark Allan Ohm and Jon Cogburn. Edinburgh
University Press.
Glissant,
Édouard. 1990. Poetics of Relation.
Translated by Betsy Wing. University of Michigan Press. https://monoskop.org/images/2/23/Glissant_Edouard_Poetics_of_Relation.pdf.
Graeber,
David. 2009. Direct Action: An
Ethnography. AK Press.
Guattari,
Félix. 1989/2014. The Three Ecologies. Translated
by Ian Pindar and Paul Sutton. Bloomsbury.
https://monoskop.org/images/4/44/Guattari_Felix_The_Three_Ecologies.pdf.
Guattari,
Félix, and Suely Rolnik. 2007. Molecular
Revolution in Brazil. Translated by Karel Clapshow
and Brian Holmes, Semiotext(e). https://monoskop.org/images/1/10/Guattari_Felix_Rolnik_Suely_Molecular_Revolution_in_Brazil_2008.pdf.
Harney,
Stefano, and Fred Moten. 2021. All
Incomplete. Minor Compositions, Autonomedia. https://monoskop.org/images/d/df/Harney_Stefano_Moten_Fred_All_Incomplete_2021.pdf.
Karaliotas,
Lazaros. 2023. “Infrastructures of dissensus: repartitioning the sensible and
articulating the political through the occupation of Greece’s public
broadcasting service.” Politics and Space
42(2):1-19.
LaBelle,
Brandon. 2018. Sonic Agency: Sound and
Emergent Forms of Resistance. Goldsmiths Press.
LaBelle,
Brandon. 2022. “Toward Acoustic Justice.”
In The Listening Biennial. Errant
Bodies Press: 129–145.
Lavery,
Carl. 2016. “Introduction: Performance and Ecology – What Can Theatre Do?” Green Letters 20(3):229–36. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14688417.2016.1206695.
Locus
Sonus Soundmap (2006–). https://locusonus.org/soundmap/.
Moten,
Fred. 2023. “Fred Moten on Palestine and the Nation-State of Israel”. In
conversation with Jared Ware. Streamed 25 October 2023 by Millennials Are killing Capitalism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWnzkjUAZnQ.
Rancière,
Jacques. 2013. The Politics of
Aesthetics. Bloomsbury.
Ruiz,
Sandra, and Hypatia Vourloumis. 2021. Formless Formation – Vignettes for the End
of This World. Minor Compositions.
Sackett,
Colin. 1995. Singinging. Axminster.
Sagri,
Georgia. 2021. Stage of Recovery. Divided
Publishing.
Schafer,
R. Murray. 1977. The Tuning Of The World. Knopf.
Self-noise.net.
2020. https://self-noise.net/acoustic%20commons/blm_brixton_3JUN2020/blm_brixton_3JUN2020.html.
Soundcamp.
2016. “The Live Audio Archive.” Leonardo 51(3):308-309.
The MIT Press.
Soundcamp.
2019. Flat Out. https://soundtent.org/flatout/.
Soundcamp.
2021. As If Radio. https://acousticommons.net/files/air.pdf.
Soundcamp.
2022. Land to Return. https://acousticommons.net/listen/land-to-return/index#.
Soundcamp.
2023–. Radio With Palestine. https://acousticommons.net/listen/rwp/.
Soundcamp.
2024. Spree~Channelsea Radio Group. Soundcamp.
Soundcamp.
2024 (Forthcoming). Notes for Ecological
Radio.
Ultra-red.
2016. “How to Hear in Common.” In Spaces
of Commoning, edited by Anette Baldauf et al.
Sternberg Press.
Audio
Delegation
of Inverbellow. As if radio… COP26 Glasgow.
31
October 2021
Radio
With Palestine #3
Saturday
11 November 2023
Radio
With Palestine #4
Saturday
7th December 2023
Radio
With Palestine (no #)
Transmission
outside the gates of UCL
Monday
6 May 2024
Radio
With Palestine #17
Saturday
18 May 2024
Full
audio archive in development at:
https://acousticommons.net/listen/rwp/
Listening Notes
[Radio With Palestine #3] 11 November
2023
Live
from demonstrations in Bruxelles and London
simultaneously.
Participating
Stations: Radio al Hara, Bethlehem; Archipel
Stations, Berlin; Wave Farm, Acra, New York; Locus Sonus, Aix-Marseille.
Streamers:
Cat Byrne, London; Nele Möller, Bruxelles; Inne Eysermans, Bruxelles; Emily
Moore,
London; Maria Papadomanolaki, Chania;
Monaï da Paula Antunes, Berlin.
Additional
stream: Rue de la Poudrière, Bruxelles
by Stéfan Piat.
Mixed
in Arnes, Catalunya by Mort Drew and Grant Smith.
Produced
by Soundcamp.
Brussels
on the right channel, London on the left: they drift in and out of sync with
each
other.
Across sites people chant together.. in a crowd beyond
the space they exist in
physically.
[Radio With Palestine #4] 7 December 2023
Live
from a picket line outside the arms manufacturer Eaton Mission Systems, Wimborn, Dorset.
Participating
Stations: Radio al Hara, Bethlehem; Archipel
Stations, Berlin; Wave Farm, Acra, New York; Locus Sonus, Aix-Marseille.
Produced
by Soundcamp.
Clip
1 is an excerpt from a remote recording of the live broadcast, which ran from
around 9 a.m. to around noon.
Listening
notes while mixing by Mort Drew
[Timestamps
from the audio clip linked]
[00:00:00]
The
crowd is singing. I can hear the energy drop in the crowd before someone thinks
up a
new
line and the energy returns. I feels very english. I smile when they laugh, my skin raises
in
goosebumps as they sing together. they...we. Are they singing to each other or
outwards?
[00:19:30]
nylon
waterproof coats rustling as people move to keep warm. chattering, whoops,
whistling.
between
chants and talks the rain can be heard hitting plastic, plastic coats, plastic
streambox
casing. i can hear the rain in the puddles on the
road as cars go past bleeping in
support,
the crowd cheers back. i can feel the cold in my
fingers. i am with them, but i
am not
present
with them.
...
[1:05:30]
people
are calling numbers out, maybe for the coaches, i am
anxious again, but not for my
friends,
they are together and they are safe. i am anxious about how small my room will be
in
comparison to this open street.
[1:08:30]
the
box is being picked up, they are saying thanks, they are saying take care. wind
or some
other
distortion cuts out the signal. a friction between my suspended reality and the
quiet in
my
room.
...
it
is over.
the
space is so quiet. my street has two birds calling at one another, someone is
on talking
maybe
on their phone, someone is downstairs knocking plates about. i am not with the
people
anymore. a car goes by and it does not beep, i cannot hear the rain puddles under
it’s
tires.
[Radio With Palestine #17] 18 May 2024
National
day of action on Nakba 76.
March
from Portland Place to Whitehall.
[12:08:09]
mort
the
energy is intense, i haven't listened remotely to a
demo in a month and it seems the energy has returned to the actions following
the latest escalations in the Gaza genocide
[12:12:17]
mort
grant
writes "from the top, thinking of this intersection as some kind of analgue [sic] filter/ gate"
"or large scale dpeaker [sic]
system"
"taking advantage of irban infrastr [sic] for amification/resonance"
"cp woodpeckers"
[12:14:36]
mort
Grant
is streaming, he is listening with his ears, he is attuned to sounds that we
might miss
Grant
is listening with his ears, we are listening to microphones
[12:16:50]
mort
I
am trying to decipher which sounds are amplified and which sounds are acoustic
megaphones,
PA systems, music coming from mobile speakers
[12:18:38]
mort
drums,
voices chanting in unison, conversations between friends as they look for a
third friend, clapping, laughter,
[12:24:31]
mort
a
media voice is trying to gather interviews
"where are the trade unions? You'll see the odd banner, but
they're not here"
-
it's a blokey voice, it seems agitated, it sounds like its
looking for a scrap
the
blokey voice belongs to the interviewer
"if you don't want to say anything
why are you here"
[12:27:14]
mort
grant
writes: "from pre constituted ideas and affiliations toward formless formations..?"
DISCONNECTED
[12:28:58]
ⓘ web20 is now known as mort
[12:29:59]
mort
grant
writes: "another pre/post maybe"
i
think the music played behind the we are the people chant is coming from brass
instruments in the space
[12:32:16]
mort
we
are the people, we won't we be silenced, stop the bombing, now now now now
[12:35:49]
mort
either
my ears are dull (i am sick) or it could be the
filter grant referenced earlier, but the sounds do sound not as expected
[12:38:24]
mort
claps,
roars, cheers, calls of oh Jeremy corbyn....is this
in response to him?
grant
writes:"corbyn arrives"
[12:40:00]
mort
helicopters
overhead
nearby
voices say "wow, this is big no?"
[12:41:54]
mort
grant
writes: "yes he jouned at the front" (corbyn joined the march?)
"now moving"
"nope not quitep [sic]"
maybe
we hear the energy build as people rally to march
drums
crescendo
"guys can we all get back now, we're about to set off"
a
countdown
cheers
"free free Palestine"
"from the river to the sea"
"in our thousands in our millions"
"palestine will be free"
the
scale of the demo is astounding
[12:45:42]
mort
bodies
absorb sound
but
we still hear hundreds and thousands of bodies moving
i
can't tell if grant is stationary or moving with thme
grant
writes: "now a pause before next bloc leaves"
[12:48:35]
mort
a
plastic drum moves past
[12:53:18]
mort
the
action is commemorating the 76th anniversary of the Nakba
the
sound of the movement is swelling
another
bloc must be moving
the
voices sound angry
hurt
people
sound out
[13:08:43]
mort
"isreal, uk,
usa, how many kids have you killed today"
[13:10:56]
mort
"viva viva Palestina"
claps,
whistles, call and response, shouts over and behind the chants
[13:12:48]
mort
listening
to the back, or top of the sound, in quieter moments, the high ends are full of
voices far away
its
hard to tell the distance
[13:15:11]
mort
"don't
leave me now.........too many bloody people"
[13:16:25]
mort
amplified
voices booming in the distance
distortions
from the bodies and buildings
its
hard to be away
its
hard to be complicit
[13:19:33]
mort
grant
writes: "oxford circus"
i
remember previous demos where they locked shoppers inside shops scared of the
damage they may face from the action
drums
are back
grant
writes: "v difficult shopping conditions"
[13:22:19]
mort
i
cannot hear london
i
hear people
[13:22:53]
mort
electronically
amplified voices and instruments
the
voices are chanting in english
but
the accents and pitches are very varied
grant
writes: "a few shoppers not givi g up"
im
thinking about the bystanders
i
don't hear them
if
we were only to listen it sounds like everyone is on the march
even
if they are talking they are mixed in with the talking
the comes from attendees too
the
action takes their voices and adds them, they are in radio with palestine
a
choir is harmonising
free
palestine
there
are aesthetics of protest
and
a harmonising choir (english sounding, church
associations) are not in them
"can I take your picture?! thank you!"
a
banjo is playing?
grant
writes: "busker looking uneasy"
thinking
again on how the action takes the buskers sound
to
make sounds that disrupt the street
grant
writes: "march is dispersed"
"regent st and side streets are
closed"
who
has closed the streets?
grant
writes: "seems like a route but not stopping like before"
"so more freeform"
"slightly surreal mingling w shoppers"
"on the edges"
[13:33:42]
mort
edge
of the crowd, edge of the protest, where are we [listeners]?
grant
writes: "in the midl hoping for signal"
"now bunching some more"
[13:35:53]
mort
i
am sat in my kitchen, listening on headphones, I am with the protest, in a way,
but Sam who is also sat here is not with the protest
the
voices leading the chat sound young
[13:36:30]
mort
chant*
[13:36:58]
mort
it
sounds like there more young voices in the response
"rishi sunk shame on you"
"1
we are the people, 2 we won't be silenced, 3 stop the bombing, now now now now"
[13:42:57]
mort
"in our lifetimes, end apartheid, in our lifetimes, free free palestine"
"we need a ceasefire now, we want a ceasefire now, we want a
ceasefire now, we need a ceasefire now"
two
scales next to one another
over
each other
[13:46:44]
mort
"
what is that"
"its a radio transmitter. we're
doing thins thing called radio with palestine."
"is it a live broadcast"
"yes it is"
"thank you for telling me"
"thank you for asking"
grant
went on to explanin the scale of different actions
and demos included in radio with palestine
and
the partners of radio with Palestine
the
asker moved back into the crowd
clipping
audio as a group chanting moves around the stream
[13:50:16]
mort
the
voice asking sounded suspicious (maybe)
thinking
on conversations grant, sasha and I had about the
awareness of cameras and visual media at actions, protests and demonstrations
and
the critiques of cameras and visual media at actions, protests and
demonstrations
but
the perhaps the lack of thought on microphones and sonic media
[13:53:15]
mort
critiques
on microphones point to bugging, cold war spies, listening in
[13:57:20]
mort
the
sounds of the space seem to be deeper, stronger lows, less high end
the
architecture of the city filtering the sounds
[14:00:55]
mort
grant
writes: "piccadilly circus"
[14:02:14]
mort
i
just checked the route, they are marching to 11 Downing
street
[14:03:24]
mort
roughly
halfway through the rote
route*
when
the audio clips as a mixer/engineer i ask grant to
move or to lower the gain
but
as a person, i want the audio clip, i want the audio to be loud, i
want my ears to move, i want be
touched by the sounds
[14:08:41]
mort
"shame on you!shame
on you!shame on you!shame on you!"
i
don't know who they are addressing, but voices are chanting in unison
[14:11:30]
mort
grant
writes: "r wing group w police cordon"
"hence shame on u.."
"openi g into haymarkeu
[sic]"
[14:13:20]
mort
it
sounds more open
the
distance increased
grant
writes: "giant chatter"
"ppl grabbing snacks"
someone
approaches
"excuse me what is this"
"its a transmitter, we're
broadcasting live"
"as in the sounds for the speakers"
the
conversation moves too fast for me to minute
but
the asker sounds interested
said
that it's really good
and
that they will look it up
the
asker did not sound suspicious (maybe)
[14:16:47]
mort
when
talking about the streambox it takes a little time to
get past expectations of the media at actions
expectations
of who gets to be transmitted
expectations
of how microphones should be situated
[14:19:52]
mort
grant
writes: "junction w pallmall"
calls
for people to join a demo on monday at the Royal
Courts of Justice for a recognised Palestinian state
[14:23:05]
mort
grant
writes: "approaching trafalgar sq now"
[14:26:39]
mort
"can i take your picture"
"this is the official collective point for.....
we are collecting to fund todays demonstration"
grant
writes: "trafalgar sq"
"quite spread out"
"turning down whitehall"
"considering stopping pretty soon"
[14:28:58]
mort
the
sounds seems thinner than before
less
low end
the
sound of chants over distance?
more
conversations, laughter, chatter
underlaying
a number of chants happening over one another
a
sense of large collections of people rather than blocs
a
dip
a
pause
a
voice over a sound system is getting clearer
i
think we are almost at the end of the march
transitions
from groups marching (flat sound) to crowds in front of speakers (hierarchal
sound)
drums
and chants not disrupted by speakers
cheers
clip the mics
the
speaker yells to the crowd, passionate
the
crowd cheers back
the
speaker is talking of lived generational experience of Nakba
[14:37:00]
mort
grant
writes: "approaching downing st"
an
mc announces the next speaker
now
that the march is stationary the chatter increases
or
the microphone is closer to the chattering
[14:38:49]
mort
the
dispersed crowd, the different points of attention, the transitions between
spaces
[14:42:04]
mort
people
ask their companions if they want to leave, but in the next breath join the
free free Palestine chant
[14:44:27]
mort
the
cheers and wells of the crowd are high pitched
for
a moment they remind me of the pacific ocean
the
sounds shift as grant moves away
grant
writes"leaving thru a side route"
[14:45:52]
mort
there
are footsteps, young people talking, it sounds warm
i
go to end the broadcast
[14:46:47]
mort
the
sounds of the london demonstration fades down
and
i am back in my kitchen
there
is a wren calling just by an open window
the
fridge is humming
sounds
sound closer
and
i feel far away
thank
you for listening
Radio
With Palestine #17
DISCONNECTED
[Notes
from Internet Relay Chat]
acousticommons.net/listen
)
Listening room (
11
January 2023
Outside
the International Court of Justice, The Hague
Live
stream by Ivo Blackwood
[08:20:15]
ⓘ web98 is now known as grant
[08:20:46]
@
grant
Ivo
Blackwood is outside the International Court in The Hague
[08:56:04]
@
grant
Resonance
is a phenomenon that occurs when an object or system is subjected to an
external force or vibration that matches its natural frequency.
When
this happens, the object or system absorbs energy from the external force and
starts vibrating with a larger amplitude.
[08:58:50]
@
grant
Resonance
can occur in various systems, such as mechanical, electrical, or acoustic
systems, and it is often desirable in certain applications, such as musical
instruments or radio receivers.
[09:01:21]
@
grant
Gascia
Ouzonian has spoken about how in Gaza the war
announces itself through sounds
[09:02:18]
@
grant
with
pings of phones announcing impending air strikes
buildings
will transduce sounds
acoustic
energy and mechanical energy combine in a relentless chain of transduction
in
which 'sounds of the heart are mocked'
in
moving sounds from place to place..
[09:05:35]
@
grant
can
we work in support of an acoustic justice
[09:18:08]
web42
listening
here and listening to radio a hara.
[09:18:35]
@
grant
thank
you for listening
[09:18:55]
web42
here
there is a sense of space, of people next to each other, close to one another,
chattering, murmuring, booing, cheering
radio
al hará is straight from the speakers
mic or at least much closer, you cannot hear the crowd cheer between pauuses
[09:19:47]
@
grant
so
many textures of voices, also rustling..
[09:20:39]
web42
two
very different versions of what is happening
[09:21:16]
@
grant
for
sure
[09:36:43]
@
grant
al
hara will try to mix both feeds
[09:48:35]
@
grant
when
i hear bike bells i think
of that recording of a demo on aporee by radio CONA:
Protest from the balconies foes to the wheels.
[09:49:57]
@
grant
In
Ljubljana on 1 May 2020. A thread of minor acts or sonic resistance..
ha
[09:52:00]
@
grant
'After
weeks of silence..... Ljubljana is..
alive again [they wrote – during the pandemic]
Something
about activating the streets and public spaces..
..
causing sounds to resonate and bounce around
soup!
[09:53:19]
web42
"everything is getting live streamed"
[09:53:44]
@
grant
ha
ha it is and yet..
what
is quite nice here.. we can t
see the screen
[09:55:00]
web42
way
marker screen
[09:55:47]
@
grant
ah
yes
whereas
listening here is maybe more about disorientation
[09:56:22]
web42
how
long have we been walking?
how
far away are we?
[09:56:27]
@
grant
a
kind of uncertainty that comes from being on edge
multiply
on the edges
not
long
'Articulation
implies a separation, a distance'
This
voice is very clear. Is it from the screen?
[09:59:07]
web42
is
it from the court room? brought out to the people who couldn't get in
only
14 people were allowed into the public gallery
[10:00:06]
@
grant
ah
yes – the voice resonates in the building but it is
now outside
[10:00:45]
web42
?
hacking?
[10:02:20]
web42
does
this voice know they were overwritten, briefly
[10:03:29]
@
grant
it
s like:
intrinsically lossy
[10:06:20]
@
grant
you
hear the speaker dealing with their breathing
as
they produce the words
[10:16:16]
web42
the
crowd does not respond anymore
[10:17:30]
web42
is
it the weight of what we hear, or the big screen suppressing collective
response
[10:18:21]
@
grant
it
s very theatrical to listen to
[10:19:02]
web42
bird
sings, child cries
[10:19:06]
@
grant
as
well as the weight of the declaration
[10:19:37]
@
grant
yes
– this seems to add something indefinable
[10:20:27]
web42
ah!
[10:20:56]
@
grant
resonance
[10:21:59]
@
grant
we
sense people as a whole mobilising resources – from biblical texts to audio
equipment to outdoor gathering..
to
try to perform some kind of response
this
sense that the court has no capacity to enforce its findings..
[10:23:25]
web42
yes
[10:23:36]
@
grant
so
the quality of the performance becomes almost the main thing
every
hoot
[10:25:08]
web42
electronic
crackle - like dust on a vinyl
is
it in the air from the speakers or is it on our stream
[10:25:41]
@
grant
or
snow
[10:25:46]
web42
sound
of materiality
or
light rain
[10:26:11]
@
grant
recalling
air
[10:27:27]
@
grant
'I
am breathing my house'
(Eyal
Weizman)
[10:29:54]
@
grant
dust,
barely noticeable, contains traces of violence to people and land
Sumayya
Vally – Ingesting Architecture on urbanism in Johannesburg
[10:30:50]
web42
the
court feels so remote, that their actions are remote, but listening together,
to people listening together, feels closer
[10:31:47]
@
grant
mm
[10:32:04]
web42
our
actions face the court, or other systems of power
it
feels like some organisers set it up that way, and some, perhaps better organisers,
ask us to face each other
[10:33:00]
@
grant
the
assembly, and the distance – a kind of extended witnessing – there it is again
like
cellophane
ah
yes
different
dramaturgies..
i
would say the remote listening is both less and more in the way some of the
patterns are suspeneded (like the screen)
but
others like the presence of others, are lost
[10:35:15]
web42
do
you not feel the people next to you when listening?
[10:37:03]
@
grant
i
think in Swahili the word 'sikia' spans both 'hear'
and 'feel' in English
[10:38:12]
@
grant
as
in kusikia barida to feel
cold or kusikia ndege to
hear a bird
I
wonder if Ivo is feeling cold
[10:39:16]
web42
When
they sing together my skin raises in goosebumps, when they cheer and laugh i smile
[10:40:31]
@
grant
This
stream is coming to an end
Thank
you to Ivo Blackwood for the live stream from near the International Court or
Justice
in
The Hague
Thank
you for listening
4
people here
grant
commonslog
web42
web85