Spoofing and its Regulation

Main Article Content

Merritt B. Fox
Lawrence R. Glosten
Sue S. Guan


Nearly a century after the United States enacted its first securities laws, urgent questions remain as to the scope of manipulation law: whether manipulation is possible in principle, and if so, how the law should respond in practice. Sharp disagreement among courts, economists, and legal scholars as to whether trading or quoting activity constitutes illegal manipulation has led to a legal framework that lacks precision and cogency. Moreover, the poorly articulated normative basis for court rulings has resulted in enforcement that is both under-inclusive and over-inclusive in ways that do a poor job of discouraging socially harmful transactions and enabling socially beneficial ones. 

This Article seeks to clarify this confusion. Drawing on microstructure and financial economics, this Article offers a new understanding of a common kind of quote-driven manipulation, often referred to as “spoofing.” By employing an analytical and normative framework developed previously by two of the authors in assessing another major form of manipulation, trade-driven manipulation, this Article assesses the impact of spoofing on what occurs in the securities markets and carefully evaluates its effects on social welfare and economic efficiency. The result is a new understanding of quote-based manipulation that helps resolve essential questions in manipulation law and provides guidance for future regulation and enforcement. 

Article Details

Symposium on the Future of Securities Regulation: Part II
How to Cite
Merritt B. Fox, Lawrence R. Glosten, & Sue S. Guan. (2022). Spoofing and its Regulation. Columbia Business Law Review, 2021(3). https://doi.org/10.52214/cblr.v2021i3.9109

Most read articles by the same author(s)