An Unintended Abolition Family Regulation During the COVID-19 Crisis

Main Article Content

Anna Arons


In a typical year, New York City’s vast family regulation system, fueled by an army of mandated reporters, investigates tens of thousands of reports of child neglect and abuse, policing almost exclusively poor Black and Latinx families even as the government provides those families extremely limited support. When the City shut down in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, this system shrunk in almost every conceivable way as mandated reporters retreated, caseworkers adopted less intrusive investigatory tactics, and family courts constrained their operations. Reports fell, the number of cases filed in court fell, and the number of children separated from their parents fell. At the same time, families found support elsewhere, through suddenly burgeoning mutual aid networks and infusions of new government entitlements. This large-scale reconfiguration of the family regulation system represents a short-term experiment in abolition: in this period, New Yorkers moved away from a system that oppressed poor Black and Latinx people and not only envisioned but built a more democratic and humane model to protect families.

As this Article demonstrates, under this new model, families remained just as safe. Data from the courts and from the city’s Administration for Children’s Services reveal that there was no rise in child neglect or abuse during the shutdown period. Furthermore, once the City began to re-open, there was no perceivable “rebound effect,” i.e. a delayed, compensatory rise in reports. This Article positions the COVID-19 shutdown period as a successful case study, demonstrating one possible future absent the massive, oppressive apparatus of the family regulation system.

Author Biography

Anna Arons, NYU School of Law

Anna Arons is an Acting Assistant Professor of Lawyering. Her research focuses on the government's regulation and policing of families and the intersection of parental rights and race, gender, and poverty. Prior to joining the Lawyering faculty, she was a public defender in the family defense practice of Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem, where she represented parents in cases where the government was attempting to remove their children from their care or otherwise impinge on their rights. She received her bachelor’s degree from Barnard College and her law degree from Yale Law School. 

Article Details

abolition, covid, coronavirus, family, law, family law, race, racial justice, child, pandemic, crisis, justice system, research, legal research, regulation, CJRL, columbia journal race law
How to Cite
Arons, A. (2022). An Unintended Abolition: Family Regulation During the COVID-19 Crisis. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 12(1).