Neuroscience and Law: The Evidentiary Value of Brain Imaging
Main Article Content
Abstract
Neuroimaging evidence should be restricted in terms of admissibility in the courts, and should only be considered reliable under scientifically valid clinical methods. This topic will be approached in four stages: (1) a brief introduction to neuroscience and law, (2) a discussion of evidentiary laws in the American legal system, (3) a review of modern neuroimaging and the admissibility and applicability of neuroimaging evidence in the courtroom using actual cases, and 4) a closing argument, including interdisciplinary perspectives on neuroscience and law.
Article Details
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Shafi, N. (2009). Neuroscience and Law: The Evidentiary Value of Brain Imaging. Graduate Student Journal of Psychology, 11, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.52214/gsjp.v11i.10841