Agreement between vestibular elective physical therapy students and experienced physical therapists in identifying nystagmus during positional testing and diagnosing benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to measure the effectiveness of a vestibular elective in preparing students to perform nystagmus identification and diagnosing benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) through an investigation of agreement between student performances and experienced physical therapists.
Methods: Seven students watched eye movement videos during positioning testing of 14 patients. Students recorded the nystagmus characteristics for each position and made diagnoses. The students completed additional surveys. Pairwise percent agreement and kappa statistics (κ) were used to compare agreement between each students’ conclusions to those of an experienced physical therapist obtained from a previous study. Krippendorff’s alpha (α) was used to analyze the overall reliability of student ability for these skills.
Results: Interrater agreement between students and the expert was fair to almost perfect (κ = 0.22 to 1) in identifying nystagmus, and slight to almost perfect (κ = −0.02 to 1) in diagnosing BPPV. There was moderate agreement between students to identify nystagmus (α = 0.58–0.65, average agreement = 80–83%) during positional testing, and fair to moderate agreement to diagnose BPPV (α = 0.38 to 0.53, average agreement = 64–74%). Agreement was higher in cases of typical BPPV presentations. Students reported the task as difficult, had the necessary knowledge, and wanted more practice. Correlations (r = 0.76 to 0.82) were seen between clinical experience with BPPV and lower perceived difficulty.
Conclusion: Students are capable of identifying nystagmus and diagnosing typical BPPV; however, students may require more practice, clinical experience, and mentorship to improve reliability. The results may help determine educational needs to prepare clinicians to manage individuals with BPPV.
References
2. Bhattacharyya N, Gubbels SP, Schwartz SR, et al. Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2017) 156(3_suppl): S1–47. doi: 10.1177/0194599816689667
3. Epley JM. The canalith repositioning procedure: for treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1992) 107(3): 399–404. doi: 10.1177/019459989210700310
4. Lempert T. Horizontal benign positional vertigo. Neurology (1994) 44(11): 2213–4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.11.2213-a
5. Semont A, Freyss G, Vitte E. Curing the BPPV with a liberatory maneuver. Adv Otorhinolaryngol (1988) 42: 290–3. doi: 10.1159/000416126
6. Blau P, Shoup A. Reliability of a rating scale used to distinguish direction of eye movement using infrared/video ENG recordings during repositioning maneuvers. Int J Audiol (2007) 46(8): 427–32. doi: 10.1080/14992020701355082
7. Galgon AK, Tate A, Fitzpatrick M, et al. Agreement between physical therapists in diagnosing benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. J Neurol Phys Ther (2021) 45(2): 79–86. doi: 10.1097/npt.0000000000000349
8. Steinhardt SJ, Kelly WN, Clark JE, et al. An artistic active-learning Approach to teaching a substance use disorder elective course. Am J Pharm Educ (2020) 84(4): 7634. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7634
9. Jann MW, Penzak S, White A, et al. An elective course in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health and practice issues. Am J Pharm Educ (2019) 83(8): 6967. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6967
10. Kerr JL, Stahnke AM, Behnen EM. Assessing empathy and self-efficacy levels of pharmacy students in an elective diabetes management course. Am J Pharm Educ (2015) 79(3): 42. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79342
11. Lazarus MD, Kauffman Jr, GL, Kothari MJ, et al. Anatomy integration blueprint: a fourth-year musculoskeletal anatomy elective model. Anat Sci Educ (2014) 7(5): 379–88. doi: 10.1002/ase.1439
12. Puljak L, Sapunar D. Web-based elective courses for medical students: an example in pain. Pain Med (2011) 12(6): 854–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01104.x
13. Klafke N, Homberg A, Glassen K, et al. Addressing holistic healthcare needs of oncology patients: implementation and evaluation of a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) course within an elective module designed for healthcare professionals. Complement Ther Med (2016) 29: 190–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.10.011
14. Bareiss SK, Nare L, McBee K. Evaluation of pain knowledge and attitudes and beliefs from a pre-licensure physical therapy curriculum and a stand-alone pain elective. BMC Med Educ (2019) 19(1): 375. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1820-7
15. Masin HPT, Tischenko AK. Professionalism, attitudes, beliefs and transformation of the learning experience: cross-cultural implications for developing a Spanish elective for non–Spanish-speaking physical therapist students. J Phys Ther Educ (2007) 21(3): 40–6. doi: 10.1097/00001416-200710000-00006
16. Wassinger CA. Pain knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of doctor of physical therapy students: changes across the curriculum and the role of an elective pain science course. J Man Manip Ther (2021) 29(5): 288–96. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2021.1879509
17. Sim J, Wright CC. The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther (2005) 85(3): 257–68. doi: 10.1093/ptj/85.3.257
18. Zapf A, Castell S, Morawietz L, et al. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data – which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? BMC Med Res Methodol (2016) 16(1): 93. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0200-9
19. Scott K, Wissinger J, Hand B, et al. Considering domain-specific experiential learning: self-efficacy in pediatric physical therapy education. Pediatr Phys Ther (2021) 33(3): 163–9. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000797
20. Wainwright SF, Shapard KF, Harman LB, et al. Factors that influence the clinical decision making of novice and experienced physical therapists. Phys Ther (2011) 91(1): 87–101. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100161
21. Wainwright SF, Shepard KF, Harman LB, et al Novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians: a comparison of how reflection is used to inform the clinical decision-making process. Phys Ther (2010) 90(1): 75–88. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090077
22. May S, Greasley A, Reeve S, et al. Expert therapists use specific clinical reasoning processes in the assessment and management of patients with shoulder pain: a qualitative study. Aust J Physiother (2008) 54(4): 261–6. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(08)70005-9
23. Resnik L, Jensen GM. Using clinical outcomes to explore the theory of expert practice in physical therapy. Phys Ther (2003) 83(12): 1090–106. doi: 10.1093/ptj/83.12.1090
24. Lindell E, Finizia C, Johansson M, et al. Asking about dizziness when turning in bed predicts examination findings for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. J Vestib Res (2018) 28(3–4): 339–47. doi: 10.3233/ves-180637
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.