Supplementing acute care clinical education experiences with simulation-based learning: a pilot study

Elsa Drevyn; Sabine  Gempel; Martha Bloyer; Neva Kirk-Sanchez; Zahilly  Salinas; Barry Issenberg

doi:10.52214/jcept.v7.13010

PDF HTML EPUB XML

Published Dec 31, 2025

DOI https://doi.org/10.52214/jcept.v7.13010

Elsa Drevyn

Physical Therapy Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-6080

Sabine Gempel

Physical Therapy Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-5968

Martha Bloyer

Physical Therapy Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6019-2487

Neva Kirk-Sanchez

Physical Therapy Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3996-7505

Zahilly Salinas

Physical Therapy Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-8907

Barry Issenberg

Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-4736

Abstract

Rationale: Physical therapist (PT) educational programs must prepare students to practice across the continuum of care, but students often lack confidence in the acute care setting. The purpose of this report is to describe a pilot study aimed at exploring a simulation-based learning experience (SBLE) as a complement to an acute care clinical experience (CE) and its effect on student performance and confidence.

Methods: In this quasi-experimental cohort pilot study, the performance and confidence of three students (intervention group-IG) participating in a supplemental SBLE, while completing their final CE in an acute care setting, were compared to six students (control group-CG) who did not participate in the SBLE. The Acute Care Confidence Survey and the Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI) 2.0 were utilized to assess four learning competencies: Safety, Communication, Patient Management, and Clinical Reasoning.

Results: At midterm and final CPI ratings, the IG showed a trend towards higher scores than the CG in 60% of the relevant categories. Participants in the IG showed similar confidence scores to participants in the CG at the end of the CE.

Discussion and conclusion: This project provided an opportunity for students to self-reflect as part of the SBLE on their patient management, in the acute care setting, with guidance by faculty. This project adds to the evidence on how simulation-based learning can complement physical therapy clinical education.

References

1.
CAPTE-PT-standards-required-elements.pdf [updated 28 September 2022]. Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education. Available from: https://www.capteonline.org/globalassets/capte-docs/capte-pt-standards-required-elements.pdf [cited 23 August 2024].

2.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational outlook handbook. Physical Therapists [updated 17 April 2024]. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/physical-therapists.htm#tab-3 [cited 11 June 2024].

3.
A physical therapy profile: demographics of the profession, 2021–2022 a report from the American Physical Therapy Association. 2023. Available from: https://www.apta.org/contentassets/831610116033426c8f5fd8777dd63c2e/2023_apta_demographics_report.pdf [cited 31 July 2023].

4.
Peiris C, Shields N, Brusco N, et al. Additional physical therapy services reduce length of stay and improve health outcomes in people with acute and subacute conditions: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (2018) 99(11): 2299–312. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.005

5.
Seip J, Drinkwine P. Collaborative care across the acute and subacute continuum facilitated by physical therapy in the emergency department. J Acute Care Phys Ther (2020) 11(2): 79–83. doi: 10.1097/jat.0000000000000121

6.
Shoemaker M, Gutowski A, Mallgren M, et al. Physical therapist determination of discharge disposition in the acute care setting. J Acute Care Phys Ther (2019) 10(3): 93–106. doi: 10.1097/jat.0000000000000099

7.
Ohtake P, Lazarus M, Schillo R, et al. Simulation experience enhances physical therapist student confidence in managing a patient in the critical care environment. Phys Ther (2013) 93(2): 216–28. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110463

8.
Sabatke M, Young A, Johnson A, et al. Strengthening the acute care curriculum: the effect on physical therapy students over a decade. J Acute Care Phys Ther (2022) 13(1): 16–23. doi: 10.1097/JAT.0000000000000166

9.
Silberman N, Litwin B, Panzarella K, et al. High fidelity human simulation improves physical therapist student self-efficacy for acute care clinical practice. J Phys Ther Educ (2015) 30(1): 14–24. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201630010-00003

10.
Blackstock F, Watson K, Morris N, et al. Simulation can contribute a part of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy clinical education: two randomized trials. Simul Healthc (2013) 8(1): 32–42. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318273101a

11.
Silberman N, Litwin B, Panzarella K, et al. Student clinical performance in acute care enhanced through simulation training. J Acute Care Phys Ther (2016) 7(1): 25–36. doi: 10.1097/JAT.0000000000000021

12.
Dale D, Perlow E, Lucado A. Partial substitution of simulation-based learning allows equal student self-confidence in the acute care setting. J Acute Care Phys Ther (2023) 14(1): 10–17. doi: 10.1097/JAT.0000000000000199

13.
Lateef F. Simulation-based learning: just like the real thing. J Emerg Trauma Shock (2010) 3(4): 348–52. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.70743

14.
Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, et al. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach (2013) 35(10): e1511–30. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632

15.
McGaghie W, Issenberg B, Petrusa E, et al. Revisiting ‘A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009’. Med Educ (2016) 50(10): 986–91. doi: 10.1111/medu.12795

16.
Lapkin S, Levett-Jones T, Bellchambers H, et al. Effectiveness of patient simulation manikins in teaching clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review. Clin Simul Nurs (2010) 6(6): e207–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2010.05.005

17.
Watson K, Wright A, Morris N, et al. Can simulation replace part of clinical time? Two parallel randomised controlled trials. Med Educ (2012) 46(7): 657–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04295.x

18.
Alinier G, Oriot D. Simulation-based education: deceiving learners with good intent. Adv Simul (2022) 7(1): 8. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00206-3

19.
Kim M, Kim S. Debriefing practices in simulation-based nursing education in South Korea. Clin Simul Nurs (2017) 13(5): 201–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2017.01.008

20.
Fanning R, Gaba D. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc (2007) 2(2): 115–25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539

21.
Coates W, Jordan J, Clarke S. A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: part 2-coding and thematic analysis. AEM Educ Train (2021) 5(4): e10645. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10645

22.
Greenwood K, David N, Maura D. Reliability and validity of the acute care confidence survey: an objective measure to assess students’ self-confidence and predict student performance for inpatient clinical experiences. J Acute Care Phys Ther (2014) 5(1): 1–10. doi: 10.1097/01.JAT.0000446087.82782.f5

23.
Rosenfeldt A, Greenwood K, Lubbeck K, et al. The acute care confidence survey: examination of the psychometric properties and predictors of performance among students in a large inpatient hospital system. J Phys Ther Ed (2020) 34(2): 166–71. doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000138

24.
Roach K, Frost J, Francis N, et al. Validation of the revised physical therapist clinical performance instrument (PT CPI): version 2006. Phys Ther (2012) 92(3): 416–28. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110129

25.
American Physical Therapy Association. Physical therapist clinical performance instrument (PT CPI). Available from: https://www.apta.org/PTCPI/ [cited 3 August 2023].

26.
Stocker B, Silberman N, Rucker J, et al. Simulation-based education in physical therapist professional education: a scoping review. Phys Ther (2022) 102: 1–12. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac133

27.
Watts PI, McDermott DS, Alinier G, et al. Healthcare simulation standards of best practice^TM simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs (2021) 58: 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.009

28.
Peng CR, Schertzer K. Rapid cycle deliberate practice in medical simulation [updated 24 July 2023]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551533/ [cited 6 July].

29.
Al Gharibi KA, Schmidt N, Arulappan J. Effect of repeated simulation experience on perceived self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today (2021) 106: 105057. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105057

Keywords:

Clinical Education, Simulation, Acute Care, Clinical experience, Student performance, Student confidence

Issue

Vol. 7 (2025)

Section

Original Research Articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Drevyn, E., Gempel, S. ., Bloyer, M., Kirk-Sanchez, N., Salinas, Z. ., & Issenberg, B. (2025). Supplementing acute care clinical education experiences with simulation-based learning: a pilot study. The Journal of Clinical Education in Physical Therapy, 7. https://doi.org/10.52214/jcept.v7.13010

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Abstract

References

Article Details