Impact of In-class Patient and Integrated Clinical Experiences on Physical Therapist Students’ Clinical Performance

Main Article Content

Jamie Bayliss


Rationale: A variety of clinical education (CE) exist. Models emphasizing full-time clinical experiences (FTCE) have higher number of full-time hours (high-hours) with less prior didactic preparation and integration with the curriculum. Models including integrated clinical experiences (ICE), part-time ICE (PTICE), and in-class patient experiences (IcPE) integrate experiences with didactic content but include a lower number of full-time hours (low-hours). The purpose of this study is to determine if a re-designed CE curricular model that emphasized IcPEs and ICE with low-hours better prepares students than a version that emphasized FTCEs with high-hours as measured by scores on the Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on a data set of 183 Doctor of Physical Therapy students who participated in an initial and final terminal CE experience. Data included student pre-admission data, demographics, and evaluation type, period, and rating for all 18 CPI criteria for the initial and final terminal CE experiences. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics.

Results: A statistically significant difference was found between cohorts for the initial terminal CE experience midterm assessment. One CPI factor was significant on the initial terminal CE experience final assessment and the final terminal CE experience midterm assessment (p < .05). Within cohort analysis for all three CPI factors at all assessment periods were statistically significant.

Conclusion: All students significantly improved from midterm to final assessment periods of the initial and final terminal CE experiences. Therefore, IcPE, allowing faculty to mentor and provide feedback to students should be considered an alternative to FTCE prior to students’ initial terminal CE experience.

MeSH Terms: curriculum, education, students


  1. Wilson A. Integrated clinical experiences in a campus onsite clinic: a self-contained model of physical therapy clinical education. J Allied Health (2014) 12(3): 1–17. doi: 10.46743/1540-580X/2014.1493

  2. Commission on Accreditation of Physical therapist education Website. Available from: [cited 25 May 2020].

  3. Strohschein J, Hagler P, May L. Assessing the need for change in clinical education practices. Phys Ther (2002) 82: 60–172. doi: 10.1093/ptj/82.2.160

  4. Jensen G, Mostrom E, Gwyer J, et al. Learning of practice: early, integrated workplace experience matters. Paper presented at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, October 3, 2021, from AERA Online Paper Repository. Available from:

  5. Sherer CL, Morris DM, Graham C. Competency-based early clinical education experiences for physical therapist students. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract (2006) 4(2): 1–15. doi: 10.46743/1540-580X/2006.1100

  6. Stern D, Rone-Adams S. An alternative model for first level clinical education experiences in physical therapy. IJASHP (2006) 4(3): 1–23. doi: 10.46743/1540-580X/2006.1115

  7. Clinical Education Post Summit Report (.pdf). American Council of Academic Physical Therapy Website. Available from: [cited 25 May 2020].

  8. Kelly S. On the summit. J Phys Ther Educ (2014) 28: 3–4. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201400001-00002

  9. Erikson M, Birkmeier M, Booth M, et al. Recommendations from the common terminology panel of the american council of academic physical therapy. Phys Ther (2018) 98: 754–62. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy075

  10. Wruble Hakim E, Moffat M, Becker E, et al. Application of education theory and evidence in support of an integrated model of clinical education. J Phys Ther Educ (2014) 28(1): 13–21.

  11. Mai J, Stern D, Hollman J, et al. Examining the impact of an integrated clinical experience (ICE) on interpersonal skills prior to the first, full-time clinical education experience: cool as ICE. J Phys Ther Educ (2014) 28(2): 81–97.

  12. Weddle M, Sellheim D. Linking the classroom and the clinic: a model of integrated clinical education for first-year physical therapy students. J Phys Ther Educ (2011) 25(3): 68–79. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201107000-00011

  13. Weddle M, Sellheim D. An integrative curriculum model preparing physical therapists for Vision 2020 practice. J Phys Ther Educ (2009) 23(1): 12–21.

  14. Mai J, Thiele A, O’Dell B, et al. Utilization of an integrated clinical experience in a physical therapist education program. J Phys Ther Educ (2013) 27(2): 25–32. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201301000-00009

  15. Benson J, Provident I, Szucs K. An experiential learning lab embedded in a didactic course: outcomes from a pediatric intervention course. Occup Ther Health Care (2013) 27(1): 46–57.

  16. Wetherbee E, Peatman N, Kenney D, et al. Standards for clinical education: a qualitative study. J Phys Ther Educ (2009) 24: 35–43.

  17. Engelhard C, McCallum C. A description of current curricular design models used in physical therapy clinical education and their relationship to pass rates on the National Physical Therapy Examination. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract (2015) 13(4): 1–9. doi: 10.46743/1540-580X/2015.1541

  18. Lekkas P, Larsen T, Jumar S, et al. No model of clinical education for physiotherapy students is superior to another: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother (2007) 53: 19–28. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(07)70058-2

  19. Coker P. Effects of an experiential learning program on the clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills of occupational therapy students. J Allied Health (2010) 39: 280–6.

  20. Schreiber J, Moerchen V, Rapport MJ, et al. Experiential learning with children: an essential component of professional physical therapy education. Pediatr Phys Ther (2015) 27: 356–67.

  21. Roach K, Frost J, Francis N, et al. Validation of the revised physical therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI): version 2006. Phys Ther (2012) 92(3): 416–28. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110129

  22. American Physical Therapy Association. American Physical Therapy Association physical therapy clinical performance instrument. Available from: [updated June 2006; cited 25 May 2020].

  23. Naylor S, Norris M, Williams A. Does ethnicity, gender, or age of physiotherapy students affect performance in the final clinical placements? An exploratory study. Physiotherapy (2014):100(1): 9–13. doi: 10.1016/

  24. Dyrbye L, Harris I, Rohren C. Early clinical experiences from students’ perspectives: a qualitative study of narratives. Acad Med (2007) 82: 979–88. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318149e29c

  25. Dewey J. Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1938.

  26. Hodge P, Wright S, Barraket J, et al. Revisiting ‘how we learn’ in academia: practice-based learning exchanges in three Australian universities. Studies Higher Educ (2011) 36: 167–83. doi: 10.1080/03075070903501895

  27. Lindquist I, Engardt M, Richardson B. Early learning experiences valued by physiotherapy students. Learn Health Social Care (2004) 3: 17–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-6861.2004.00060.x

Article Details

clinical education, integrated clinical education, alternative clinical education model
Original Research Articles
How to Cite
Bayliss, J. (2021). Impact of In-class Patient and Integrated Clinical Experiences on Physical Therapist Students’ Clinical Performance. The Journal of Clinical Education in Physical Therapy, 3.