COVID-19 and shortened integrated clinical experiences: impacts on acute care confidence and interpersonal communication

Main Article Content

Tara Dickson
Erin Perez
Julie DeVahl


Purpose: Many doctor of physical therapy (DPT) programs limited student clinical experiences, including integrated clinical experiences (ICEs), in 2020 due to the restrictions of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, without knowing how the abbreviated clinical exposure would influence student perceptions of psychomotor and interpersonal communication skill development. The purpose of this study was to determine if fewer ICEs resulted in a difference in acute care confidence or interpersonal communication skills for DPT students.

Methods: Two cohorts of DPT students completed surveys aimed to measure acute care confidence (Acute Care Confidence Survey [ACCS]) and interpersonal communication skills (Interpersonal Communication Questionnaire [ICQ]) pre- and post- ICE. Students in one of the cohorts completed half of their second ICE experience because of unexpected curricular changes, effectively decreasing their ICEs by 25%. Data was analyzed using paired t-tests and two-way repeated measures ANOVAs.

Results: There was a significant interaction on ACCS and ICQ by time. Students gained an average of approximately 440 points on the ACCS and 4.9 points on the ICQ over the course of both ICEs. However, there was not a statistically significant difference between cohort and either acute care confidence or interpersonal communication.

Conclusion: Curricular changes resulting in fewer ICEs did not appear to significantly influence student confidence in the acute care environment or with interpersonal communication skills. Students gained self-confidence in acute care practice and improved communication skills when involved in hands-on ICEs. These improvements were not seen during portions of the curriculum that did not involve inpatient experiences.


  1. Hakim EW, Moffat M, Becker E, et al. Application of educational theory and evidence in support of an integrated model of clinical education. J Phys Ther Educ (2014) 28(S1): 13–21. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201400001-00005

  2. Weddle ML, Sellheim DO. Linking the classroom and the clinic: a model of integrated clinical education for first-year physical therapy students. J Phys Ther Educ (2011) 25: 68–79. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201107000-00011

  3. Patton N, Higgs J, Smith M. Clinical learning spaces: crucibles for practice development in physiotherapy clinical education. Physiother Theory Pract (2018) 34: 589–99. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1423144

  4. Wetherbee E, Peatman N, Kenney D, et al. Standards for clinical education: a qualitative study. J Phys Ther Educ (2010) 24: 35–43. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201007000-00005

  5. Willis BW, Campbell AS, Sayers SP, et al. Integrated clinical experience with concurrent problem-based learning is associated with improved clinical reasoning among physical therapy students in the United States. J Educ Eval Health Prof (2018) 15: 30. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2028.15.30

  6. Mai JA, Stern DF, Hollman JH, et al. Examining the impact of an integrated clinical experience (ICE) on interpersonal skills prior to the first, full-time clinical internship: cool as ICE. J Phys Ther Educ (2014) 28: 81–97. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201407000-00010

  7. Brueilly KE, Nelson TK, Gravano TN, Kroll PG. The effect of early contextual learning on student physical therapists’ self-perceived level of clinical preparedness. Acute Care Perspect (2009) 18: 6–13.

  8. Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE). Standards and required elements for accreditation of physical therapist education programs. Available from: [cited 13 December 2021].

  9. Recker-Hughes C, Wetherbee E, Buccieri KM, et al. Essential characteristics of quality clinical education experiences: standards to facilitate student learning. J Phys Ther Educ (2014) 28(S1): 48–55. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201400001-00009

  10. American Council of Academic Physical Therapy. Clinical Education Summit October 12-13, 2014, Kansas City, MO. Summit Report and Recommendations. Available from: [cited 2 June 2020].

  11. Myers K, Schenkman M. Utilizing a curriculum development process to design and implement a new integrated clinical education experience. J Phys Ther Educ (2017) 31: 71–82. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201731030-00014

  12. Colgrove YM, Rucker J. Begin with the end in mind: implementing a series of integrated clinical experience courses. J Phys Ther Educ (2020) 334: 120–30. doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000121

  13. Covington K, Odom C, Heflin S, et al. Student team learning in practice (STEPs®): an integrated clinical education collaborative model. J Phys Ther Educ (2017) 31: 18–29. doi: 10.1097/00001416-201731020-00004

  14. Wilson AM. Integrated clinical experiences in a campus onsite clinic: a self-contained model of physical therapy clinical education. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract (2014) 12: 1–17. doi: 10.46743/1540-580X/2014.1493

  15. American Council of Academic Physical Therapy. National Consortium of Clinical Educators. Report to ACAPT Board: COVID-19 Survey results. Available from: [cited 4 June 2020].

  16. Masley PM, Havrilko CL, Mahnensmith MR, et al. Physical therapist practice in the acute care setting: A qualitative study. Phys Ther (2011) 91(6): 906–19. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100296

  17. American Council of Academic Physical Therapy (ACAPT). Guidance on participation in clinical education experiences in physical therapy education. Available from: [cited 4 June 2021].

  18. Timmerberg JF, Dole R, Silberman N, et al. Physical therapist student readiness for entrance into the first full-time clinical experience: a delphi study. Phys Ther (2019) 99: 131–46. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy134

  19. American Council of Academic Physical Therapy. Strategic Initiative Panels. Final Reports from: Common Terminology Panel, Integrated Clinical Education Panel, Student Readiness Panel, June 2017. Available from: [cited 2 June 2020].

  20. Greenwood KC, Nicoloro D, Iverson MD. Reliability and validity of the Acute Care Confidence Survey: an objective measure to assess students’ self-confidence and predict student performance for inpatient clinical experiences. J Acute Care Phys Ther (2014) 5: 1–10. doi: 10.1097/01.JAT.0000446087.82782.f5

  21. Lewis M, Bell J, Asghar A. Use of simulated patients in development of physiotherapy students’ interpersonal skills. Int J Ther Rehabil (2008) 15: 221–7. doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2008.15.5.29234

  22. Rosenfeldt AB, Greenwood K, Lubbeck K, et al. The acute care confidence survey: examination of the psychometric properties and predictors of performance among students in a large inpatient hospital system. J Phys Ther Educ (2020) 34: 166–71. doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000138

  23. Stata statistical software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP for statistical analysis; 2015.

  24. Ansari MR. MAUCHLY: Stata module to compute Mauchly’s sphericity test for repeated measures ANOVA models. EconPapers 2017. Available from: [cited 4 June 2020].

  25. Lindquist MA, Meija A. Zen and art of multiple comparisons. Psychosom Med (2015) 77(2): 114–25. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000148

  26. Heavan C, Clegg J, Maguire P. Transfer of communication skills training from workshop to workplace: The impact of clinical supervision. Patient Educ Couns (2006) 60(3): 313–25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.008

Article Details

integrated clinical experiences, acute care confidence, psychomotor skill, affective domain, readiness for full-time clinical education
Original Research Articles
How to Cite
Dickson, T., Perez, E., & DeVahl, J. (2022). COVID-19 and shortened integrated clinical experiences: impacts on acute care confidence and interpersonal communication. The Journal of Clinical Education in Physical Therapy, 4.